The Incredible Incarnation
When Jesus stepped down from heaven to be born in a manger, He did more than most people realize.
I have some Christian friends who do not celebrate Christmas. They object to the many pagan traditions that have crept into the holiday and argue that Jesus was not even born on December 25. I don’t disagree. They are quite correct.
But the reason for the season is not Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, Santa Claus, Frosty the Snowman, or roasting chestnuts on an open fire. December 25 is the date Christians have set apart to commemorate the Incarnation, a doctrine clearly taught in the New Testament: “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifested in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up in glory” (1 Tim. 3:16, emphasis added).
THE FOUNDATIONS OF FAITH
You can learn the biblical truth of Christ’s incarnation in The Foundations of Faith by Renald Showers.
My Jewish friends struggle with the doctrine of the Incarnation. To them the concept of God becoming flesh seems to contradict their understanding of God. But the Incarnation is not unique to the New Testament. The Old Testament prophets looked forward to God becoming man: “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of you shall come forth to Me the One to be Ruler in Israel, whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting” (Mic. 5:2, emphasis added).
This prophecy spoke of a future ruler who would be born in Bethlehem. Although He would be born, as we all are, this Baby was different: He was “from everlasting.” The Hebrew word translated “everlasting” is olam, which means “vanishing point” or “eternity.” Moses identified the everlasting one as God: “Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever You had formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting [olam] to everlasting [olam], You are God” (Ps. 90:2).
The rabbis of Jesus’ time understood that Micah 5:2 referred to the Messiah:
And when he [Herod] had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ [Messiah] was to be born. So they said to him, “In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet: ‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are not the least among the rulers of Judah; for out of you shall come a Ruler who will shepherd My people Israel’” (Mt. 2:4–6).
Through the prophet Isaiah, the Lord revealed the Messiah would be born of a virgin and would be called Immanuel. “Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the virgin shall conceive, and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel” (Isa. 7:14).
Most rabbis, as well as many liberal Christians, argue that the Hebrew word almah (which is translated as “virgin”) actually means young woman. However, when the Jewish people translated the Old Testament into the Greek Septuagint in the mid-3rd and 2nd centuries BC, they translated almah as parthenos, a Greek word that unequivocally means virgin.
Looking at Isaiah 7:14, translating the word almah as young woman does not make sense. When Isaiah gave the prophecy, the Lord had just told King Ahaz of Judah to ask for a sign to confirm God’s promise that Judah would not be destroyed by the armies of Syria and Israel: “Moreover the LORD spoke again to Ahaz, saying, ‘Ask a sign for yourself from the LORD your God; ask it either in the depth or in the height above’” (vv. 10–11).
In a display of false piety, King Ahaz replied, “I will not ask, nor will I test the LORD!” (v. 12). Having rejected the Lord’s offer for a sign, Isaiah turned from King Ahaz to the house of David to announce the Lord’s sign:
Hear now, O house of David! Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will you weary my God also? Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel (vv. 13–14).
A natural conception would not grab the house of David’s attention. The world has seen billions of young women conceive and bear sons. But a virgin having a child—now that would be a sign that should get the children of Israel’s attention. That miracle would be fulfilled by the conception and birth of Jesus:
Now the birth of Jesus Christ was as follows: After His mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit. Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not wanting to make her a public example, was minded to put her away secretly. But while he thought about these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take to you Mary your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins” (Mt. 1:18–21).
The name Immanuel signified the Messiah’s divinity:
So all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying: “Behold, the virgin shall be with child, and bear a Son, and they shall call His name Immanuel,” which is translated, “God with us” (vv. 22–23).
The Incarnation was also prophesied in Isaiah 9:6–7:
For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given; and the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Of the increase of His government and peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and over His kingdom, to order it and establish it with judgment and justice from that time forward, even forever. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.
The Messiah’s humanity is described in the phrases a Child is born and a Son is given. His divinity is expressed in His names Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, and Everlasting Father; and His eternal authority is seen in the phrase of the increase of His government there will be no end.
Christmas a pagan holiday? It can be if we let it be. But when I sit in a coffee shop at the mall at Christmastime, I can’t help noticing Christmas carols playing in the background. Every year, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation broadcasts Handel’s Messiah. Both sides of our family are at best nominal Christians. Yet every year they ask me to read the Christmas story as we gather together to celebrate Christmas.
My Muslim and Jewish friends make it a point to wish me a hearty “Merry Christmas!” It is the one time of the year where it seems politically correct to publicly proclaim the Good News—that the Messiah was manifested in the flesh. He and He alone is the reason we celebrate Christmas, as we thank God for the Incarnation.
8 thoughts on “The Incredible Incarnation”
I agree with you totally!
Thank you Rhonda
Beautiful…thanks for reminding us of the real reason for our Christmas celebration
Thank you Karen
I doubt very much that any Christians, and/or people who know about the birth of Jesus, other than about 1%, have any misgivings about Christmas having some sort of “pagan origins”. They accept Christmas as a day to commemorate the birth of the Christians’ Savior and God. Far better to use the season as an opportunity to proclaim His birth and the purpose for which He came than to quibble about some alleged pagan origins of the day and decide to boycott the whole thing.
Thank you James
Amen, brother! A great defense of why we should celebrate Christmas, even though it has been taken hostage by paganism.
Yes, the day is for remembering the Truth given in The Bible. Some have suggested that Christ Jesus “tabernacled” as per John 1:14: “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt / -tabernacled- among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.”
I have always understood that this statement: “For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given” referred to both the human and the divine. The “Child born” is the human and the “Son given” is the divine Son of God.